Does anyone know what the setting would be for this new route?thanks
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Notice to all visitors and members of the Train-Sim.Com message forums:
If you plan on using a signature banner in your posts, we would like to remind you that there is a maximum size for banners. That maximum is 450 pixels wide by 120 pixels high, and not to exceed 25k. Your compliance is appreciated. FORUM RULES Problems? There are two common reasons for problems with logging in and posting messages. The first is that you are running a firewall that prevents your messages from being sent to the server. The other is that you have cookies disabled; the DCForum software requires cookies to work properly.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Reading Topic #24339
Does anyone know what the setting would be for this new route?thanks
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
I have not done this route yet, but a good starting poing would be 0.69 or .070.Cheers; Chuck F.
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Whatever the radius is, multiply by 8.67. I don't have Whitefish, but if he used default BNSF signals that would be 0.11, which comes out to 0.95.http://www.train-sim.com/dcforum/DCForumID6/12281.htmlSome adjustment may be necessary, if you switch to the headout view and stop 1 meter away from the signal, look at the size of the light. If it's too big reduce the radius number slightly, if it's too small (or it disappears when you get close, which means it's too small to see) make it bigger.Be advised, any route that has forest regions is gonna have a problem with the new siglight.ace alpha channel:http://www.train-sim.com/dcforum/DCForumID3/24338.html
[ Home | MSTS Forum | MSTS FAQ | How To... | File Library ] Copyright © 2004 by Nels Anderson. All Rights Reserved.
Restored from the Train-Sim.Com archive, captured August 16, 2004. About this archive.