Train-Sim.Com
MSTS Activity Design

Activity packaging

Notice to all visitors and members of the Train-Sim.Com message forums:
If you plan on using a signature banner in your posts, we would like to remind you that there is a maximum size for banners. That maximum is 450 pixels wide by 120 pixels high, and not to exceed 25k. Your compliance is appreciated. FORUM RULES Problems? There are two common reasons for problems with logging in and posting messages. The first is that you are running a firewall that prevents your messages from being sent to the server. The other is that you have cookies disabled; the DCForum software requires cookies to work properly.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend

Reading Topic #2103

Charter Member · 286 posts

I have noticed a few references to using routeriter as a activity packager.
What is the general consensus from this forum regarding packaging between the MSTS packager and routeriter?
I have a couple of activities ready to upload for my Southrail route and have used the MSTS packager.
Feedback from testers indicates no problems using the unpackager.
Routeriter was used to package a couple of ativities I did for the Sumpter Valley route and I received e-mails with problems unpacking them?
There seems to be two schools of thought out there and although I am not going to be involved in producing to many activities, I prefer route building, they have been asked for in Southrail and although they may not suit everyone, I at least want them to unpackage correctly.Cheers

Nocturnal Flightless Bird

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 628 posts

RE: Activity packaging

I think the primary reason the AE packager fails is because the route id and the route folder have different names. If the route folder name is exactly the same as the route id in the .trk file then it will package the activity correctly.Unpacking is not an issue because tsunpack doesn't use the route folder name when the activity is unpacked.Regards,Eric

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 286 posts

RE: Activity packaging

Thanks for the reply Eric.
I guess I have a consensus of one that tells me as long as the conditions you posted are adhered to, using the MSTS packager is ok.
Cheers

Nocturnal Flightless Bird

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 1162 posts

RE: Activity packaging

Click to send message via ICQ

For what little it is worth, I agree with what Eric said above. I've sent a few up here and probably 20 or so to NERR and so far have not had a problem with the packager. However, as he says .. everything needs to match.RobertR .. ADF-M&RM at http://www.adfrr.com

Alert | IP


[ Home | MSTS Forum | MSTS FAQ | File Library ] Copyright © 2004 by Nels Anderson. All Rights Reserved.

Restored from the Train-Sim.Com archive, captured May 17, 2004. About this archive.