Train-Sim.Com
MSTS Route Design

Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data

Notice to all visitors and members of the Train-Sim.Com message forums:
If you plan on using a signature banner in your posts, we would like to remind you that there is a maximum size for banners. That maximum is 450 pixels wide by 120 pixels high, and not to exceed 25k. Your compliance is appreciated. FORUM RULES Problems? There are two common reasons for problems with logging in and posting messages. The first is that you are running a firewall that prevents your messages from being sent to the server. The other is that you have cookies disabled; the DCForum software requires cookies to work properly.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend

Reading Topic #9842

Charter Member · 891 posts

Gentleman,I have explained in another post what the "stupid" problem was, so here are some screen shots as a properly propelled OH proceeds over PipeStone pass and down into Butte. Scenery has been sculpted in some areas - I purposely avoid doing it around tunnels and bridges, until they are in place.1st - About mile 1500, coming around the mountain - with only the
rear pantograph up, as was normal MILW practise.2nd - Head-on shot a little further along. I don't believe the
BI-Polars were so yellow on top, but never saw one except at
The Chicago Railroad Fair in 1949, so not sure about that.3rd - A side view, but note the wire line around to the right, and
the "notch" in the distant hillside. (where #1 was taken)4th - View from Dome Car near Janney, MT5th - View from Dome car just east of Newcomb, MT6th - Unsculpted area. Train is passing over the NP, just east of
Colorado Jct., seen in distance.7th - Train is almost stopped, to throw the switch so it will head
around to the left (west). After rear clears the west switch,
it will be thrown, so train can back into the station, out of
the scene to the right. Because of the way the tracks were
arranged, a very long train would probably cause the locomotive
to stop on the wye (short station tracks & throat), but they
way these backing movements were done, this was not a problem.J. H. Sullivan

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 891 posts

RE: Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data

Forgot the pix.

Attachments
Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data – image 1
http://www.train-sim.com/dcforum/User_files/3ef3199a1777aed9.jpg
Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data – image 2
http://www.train-sim.com/dcforum/User_files/3ef319c217c877d1.jpg
Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data – image 3
http://www.train-sim.com/dcforum/User_files/3ef319cf17e97adc.jpg
Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data – image 4
http://www.train-sim.com/dcforum/User_files/3ef319db1802def5.jpg
Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data – image 5
http://www.train-sim.com/dcforum/User_files/3ef319e61834c183.jpg
Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data – image 6
http://www.train-sim.com/dcforum/User_files/3ef319ef183c6990.jpg
Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data – image 7
http://www.train-sim.com/dcforum/User_files/3ef319f818515612.jpg

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 1150 posts

RE: Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data

Jerry, are you alright? You seem to be really forgetful, - like me!
But, judging from these screens, you've been burning lots of that midnight oil. It's looking really great!Milwaukee prctice on pantographs, judging from photos and vids, seems to be to run with the forward pans up. I've seen pix of both pans up on helpers and heavy tonnage trains. And on the EP-2's (Bi-Polars) it seems the majority of them run with the rear pans up. Maybe someone with the MILW Rulebook can shed some light on this...Timtimmuir@wcn.net
timmuir2002@yahoo.com

Electric Railroad 3D Models
Willamette Valley Route
(No timetable for release)

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 891 posts

RE: Milwaukee problem fixed, now some data

According to the several books I have on the Milwaukee, it was pretty much up to the Engineer to do what he wanted, except in the case of the BiPolars. Because their pans were so close together on the roof, they were supposed to be operated with the rear pan, so that if it were damaged (they often snagged the wire, and MILW pans had much longer and deeper "horns" than eastern roads), it would not take the other pan with it.J. H. Sullivan

Alert | IP


[ Home | MSTS Forum | MSTS FAQ | File Library ] Copyright © 2002 by Nels Anderson. All Rights Reserved.

Restored from the Train-Sim.Com archive, captured July 29, 2003. About this archive.