Skip to content

MSTS Route Design

Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

Started by MSTS_Country July 28, 2004 15 posts 5 min read

Notice to all visitors and members of the Train-Sim.Com message forums:
If you plan on using a signature banner in your posts, we would like to remind you that there is a maximum size for banners. That maximum is 450 pixels wide by 120 pixels high, and not to exceed 25k. Your compliance is appreciated. FORUM RULES Problems? There are two common reasons for problems with logging in and posting messages. The first is that you are running a firewall that prevents your messages from being sent to the server. The other is that you have cookies disabled; the DCForum software requires cookies to work properly.

Locked thread - Read only
Previous Topic | Next Topic

Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend

Reading Topic #12275

MSTS_CountryMember since Jul-14-04 · 194 postsJul 28, 2004 6:09 AM

LAST EDITED ON Jul-28-04 AT 02:11 AM (EST)

Finally, the Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub will be going under Constuction,after 3 LONG years. I'm ready to start work on the Little Rock Sub. It has 35,496 tiles so its really big!!! Just need a help with dem-ex. can anyone help? BTW do I need a UP Licence?
John Reagon
John_Reagon_93@hotmail.com

Visit my website
http://www.Arkansas-sim.com

Printer-friendly page | Top

Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub [View All], MSTS_Country, 02:09 AM, Jul-28-04, (0) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, Hack, Jul-28-04, 05:37 AM, (1) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, DRGWK36, Jul-28-04, 06:51 AM, (2) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, sstyrnol, Jul-28-04, 07:20 AM, (3) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, MSTS_Country, Jul-28-04, 11:00 AM, (4) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, ATF1224, Jul-28-04, 12:45 PM, (5) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, Conrail 6406, Jul-28-04, 12:57 PM, (6) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, cnw8717, Jul-28-04, 01:58 PM, (8) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, Conrail 6406, Jul-28-04, 03:59 PM, (11) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, sstyrnol, Jul-28-04, 01:10 PM, (7) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, MSTS_Country, Jul-28-04, 02:06 PM, (9) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, ATSF104, Jul-28-04, 03:48 PM, (10) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, cnw8717, Jul-28-04, 04:41 PM, (12) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, sstyrnol, Jul-29-04, 01:25 AM, (13) RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub, westerngy, Jul-29-04, 06:56 AM, (14)

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

HackCharter Member · 3664 postsJul 28, 2004 9:37 AM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

>It has 35,496 tilesYou might consider coming back down to earth with that figure. Tiles really only need to be created where track is laid - about one tile width on either side. It sounds as though you simply selected a huge rectangular area to whack out of the RGE. Major overkill IMHO.Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains
http://www.3dtrains.com Pro Series SuperPacks

Printer-friendly page | Top

DRGWK36Charter Member · 1098 postsJul 28, 2004 10:51 AM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

35,000 tiles is way too big - on my machine it'll probably take 3 LONG years to generate the terrain buffers with that many tiles.If you need DEM-EX help, try the DEMEX forum at Digital-Rails.com. John's very good at providing help and pointing to FAQs.UP doesn't have any rights to the terrain - only to their logos. No need to get them involved.Andy

Printer-friendly page | Top

sstyrnolCharter Member · 790 postsJul 28, 2004 11:20 AM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

Good joke!!!!!!!Cheers!SebastianFeel free to IM me on: sstyrnol@hotmail.com
My email is: sebastian.styrnol@gmx.de

Ain't life great????

Printer-friendly page | Top

MSTS_CountryMember since Jul-14-04 · 194 postsJul 28, 2004 3:00 PM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

>Good joke!!!!!!!
Don't see how it could be funny or did I miss something.John Reagon
John_Reagon_93@hotmail.com

Visit my website
http://www.Arkansas-sim.com

Printer-friendly page | Top

ATF1224Member since Apr-9-03 · 1727 postsJul 28, 2004 4:45 PM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

You miss everything. What is this about the 4th time you have started this route? I remember you posting some screens from Marias Pass and calling it your own.

Jake Mensel
Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub – image 3
The Norfolk Southern Winston-Salem District

Printer-friendly page | Top

Conrail 6406Member since Jun-23-04 · 21 postsJul 28, 2004 4:57 PM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

I can't wait to see some shots from West Coram!!!

Mark Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub – image 4

Printer-friendly page | Top

cnw8717Charter Member · 329 postsJul 28, 2004 5:58 PM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

>I can't wait to see some shots from West Coram!!! Dont you mean West Little Rock.

Brock Hansen
Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub – image 5
TKW Paint Shop

Printer-friendly page | Top

Conrail 6406Member since Jun-23-04 · 21 postsJul 28, 2004 7:59 PM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

>>I can't wait to see some shots from West Coram!!!
>
>Dont you mean West Little Rock. Remember what happened the last time he posted screenshots of his "route"?

Mark Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub – image 6

Printer-friendly page | Top

sstyrnolCharter Member · 790 postsJul 28, 2004 5:10 PM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

>>Good joke!!!!!!!
>Don't see how it could be funny or did I miss something. I feel sorry for you!!! <weeping while laughing>
Cheers!SebastianFeel free to IM me on: sstyrnol@hotmail.com
My email is: sebastian.styrnol@gmx.de

Ain't life great????

Printer-friendly page | Top

MSTS_CountryMember since Jul-14-04 · 194 postsJul 28, 2004 6:06 PM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

Don't worry everyone will be happy,when the route will be finished.John Reagon
John_Reagon_93@hotmail.com

Visit my website
http://www.Arkansas-sim.com

Printer-friendly page | Top

ATSF104Member since Aug-27-03 · 701 postsJul 28, 2004 7:48 PM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

I'll believe that when I see it.-MattATSF GP60M #104 works on the local in Flagstaff, AZ.

www.atsfrr.com Please attend the up coming convention in Pasadena, California.
Vice-President of FWLS. Now Hiring!
Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub – image 8
If you cant find me at Home I'm railfanning up and down the BNSF Ft. Worth Sub.

Printer-friendly page | Top

cnw8717Charter Member · 329 postsJul 28, 2004 8:41 PM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

Also 35,000 tiles isnt that like 40gigs of tiles lol.

Brock Hansen
Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub – image 9
TKW Paint Shop

Printer-friendly page | Top

sstyrnolCharter Member · 790 postsJul 29, 2004 5:25 AM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

Yeah, but don't forget, down there in Arkansas, they have a Cray each! So MSTS runs at 60FPS... Even on a 40gig route... :pCheers!SebastianFeel free to IM me on: sstyrnol@hotmail.com
My email is: sebastian.styrnol@gmx.de

Ain't life great????

Printer-friendly page | Top

westerngyMember since Jul-18-02 · 393 postsJul 29, 2004 10:56 AM

RE: Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub

This post could take a turn for the worst.Yes this person has done things before but I guess everyone else is perfect so I wil be locking this thread to stop it here.Just Rollin Down The Tracks
Finally The Union Pacific's Little Rock Sub – image 10
Dale

Printer-friendly page | Top

[ Home | MSTS Forum | MSTS FAQ | How To... | File Library ] Copyright © 2004 by Nels Anderson. All Rights Reserved.

Restored from the Train-Sim.Com archive, captured September 30, 2004. About this archive.

More from Discussion Forums

Where are the quad-tree files stored?
MSTS Route Design forum (Jul 2004): Chuck Dollins Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | …
Smooth tracks - no more jagged rails!
MSTS Route Design forum (Jul 2004): Ever notice how the rails get not-so-curved as the radius of the curve gets larger?…
RMD-4, East Portal Shed progressing
MSTS Route Design forum (Jul 2004): Colleagues,Construction on the E.Portal snowshed will halt for a couple of days whi…
Banking
MSTS Route Design forum (Jul 2004): Does anyone know if it is actually possible bank the tracks? If it is, how do you d…
Db lines
MSTS Route Design forum (Jul 2004): My tracks are static objects without db lines. When I remove the .rdb, .tdb, rit, a…
Seaboard Air Line Progress
MSTS Route Design forum (Jul 2004): Scenery now completed 51 miles from Tampa and 32 miles left to reach Wildwood, Flor…

All Discussion Forums →