Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined

Notice to all visitors and members of the Train-Sim.Com message forums:
If you plan on using a signature banner in your posts, we would like to remind you that there is a maximum size for banners. That maximum is 450 pixels wide by 120 pixels high, and not to exceed 25k. Your compliance is appreciated. FORUM RULES Problems? There are two common reasons for problems with logging in and posting messages. The first is that you are running a firewall that prevents your messages from being sent to the server. The other is that you have cookies disabled; the DCForum software requires cookies to work properly.

Locked thread - Read only
Previous Topic | Next Topic

Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend

Reading Topic #25604

dcushingMember since Aug-14-02 · 223 postsNov 23, 2004 2:16 PM

Gentlemen, now that we have two websites for what was once one, would it be asking too much for a rep of each company to let us know the status of some of the products that were originally previewed by Maple Leaf Tracks. I'm refering to such items as the Dundas Sub, Solddier Summit, and the UP and third SP engine packs. Also, I believe there was a patch promised for Cascade Crossing that was to have activities for the first two SP engine packs. I'm not asking for release dates, just some words of assurance that some of the above items are still in the works. Thank you for advance of your replies.

Duncan

Printer-friendly page | Top

Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined [View All], dcushing, 09:16 AM, Nov-23-04, (0) RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined, westerngy, Nov-23-04, 09:44 AM, (1) RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined, Macster, Nov-23-04, 03:09 PM, (2) RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined, Hack, Nov-23-04, 03:44 PM, (3) RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined, Macster, Nov-23-04, 04:04 PM, (5) RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined, Hack, Nov-23-04, 04:15 PM, (7) RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined, Macster, Nov-23-04, 04:20 PM, (8) RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined, bnsf1959, Nov-23-04, 03:55 PM, (4) RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined, Hack, Nov-23-04, 04:08 PM, (6)

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

westerngyMember since Jul-18-02 · 540 postsNov 23, 2004 2:44 PM

RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined

Lets not have any of this right now.Its like a he sais she said and lets compare toys and what are you bringing out.No this is not needed so its locked sorry.
If only people were this concerned with MSTS as they were to what we as a people are doing to destroy this earth.Just Rollin Down The Tracks
Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined – image 1
Dale

Printer-friendly page | Top

MacsterCharter Member · 2876 postsNov 23, 2004 8:09 PM

RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined

Dale, there was no reason to lock this thread.Thank you.

______________________
http://Evergreentracks.tk

Printer-friendly page | Top

HackCharter Member · 3902 postsNov 23, 2004 8:44 PM

RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined

>Dale, there was no reason to lock this thread. True - ligitmate question without malice, IMHO.Nevertheless, wouldn't it have been more appropriate to PM Dale instead of flexing your authority in public?Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains
http://www.3dtrains.com Pro Series v4.0 SuperPacks

Printer-friendly page | Top

MacsterCharter Member · 2876 postsNov 23, 2004 9:04 PM

RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined

>Nevertheless, wouldn't it have been more appropriate to PM
>Dale instead of flexing your authority in public?
>
>Cheers!
>Marc - 3DTrains If by "flexing my authority" by simply stating that it shouldn't have been locked and also to let others know that it was wrong to lock a legit post was wrong, I'm guilty.I also thought we agreed on not to contact/type or respond to each others posts regardless.

______________________
http://Evergreentracks.tk

Printer-friendly page | Top

HackCharter Member · 3902 postsNov 23, 2004 9:15 PM

RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined

My point was that it should have been kept private. I didn't know it had been locked, and I'll bet many didn't think twice about it either (until you brought it up).>I also thought we agreed on not to contact/type or respond to each others posts regardless.I don't recall this agreement. I respond or ignore posts of my choosing.Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains
http://www.3dtrains.com Pro Series v4.0 SuperPacks

Printer-friendly page | Top

MacsterCharter Member · 2876 postsNov 23, 2004 9:20 PM

RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined

LAST EDITED ON Nov-23-04 AT 04:21 PM (EST)

Must come with the age if you forgot...Guess I'll just "flex" my power as you have in the past as well then.Good Day.

______________________
http://Evergreentracks.tk

Printer-friendly page | Top

bnsf1959Charter Member · 894 postsNov 23, 2004 8:55 PM

RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined

I'm sure they are working on some of the issues concerning the CC. I'm not speaking for them but I have read or remember some of the stuff that was address by mlt before the fallout of mlt. I think Jason might be handling the Streamlines but I'm not sure yet. I know Andy Hockin is taking over the mlt. We all have to wait and see what good comes out of this.Ken Plaza Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined – image 8

Printer-friendly page | Top

HackCharter Member · 3902 postsNov 23, 2004 9:08 PM

RE: Maple Leaf Tracks vs. Simply Streamlined

>I'm sure they are working on some of the issues concerning the CC.MLT had been testing a significant patch to address many of the issues reported for CC (activities, environment, world file placement, etc.). I'm sure just a matter of time before it becomes available. Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains
http://www.3dtrains.com Pro Series v4.0 SuperPacks

Printer-friendly page | Top

Restored from the Train-Sim.Com archive, captured December 10, 2004. About this archive.