How come the manufacturer of MSTS1 didn't drum up an identical, complementary set of signal aspects, such that there would have been 'Signal Aspects Sets "A" and "B"'? I'm certain half of the manufacturer's problems could have been avoided had they written in this seemingly-to-me-because-I-ain't-a-computer-programmer uncomplicated logic -- nature likes pairing up; Electricians, do you agree?Cheers,
goonybird
[ Home | MSTS Forum | MSTS FAQ | File Library ] Copyright © 2004 by Nels Anderson. All Rights Reserved.