Developer Mode Standardation? – BVE Forum

Notice to all visitors and members of the Train-Sim.Com message forums:
If you plan on using a signature banner in your posts, we would like to remind you that there is a maximum size for banners. That maximum is 450 pixels wide by 120 pixels high, and not to exceed 25k. Your compliance is appreciated. FORUM RULES Problems? There are two common reasons for problems with logging in and posting messages. The first is that you are running a firewall that prevents your messages from being sent to the server. The other is that you have cookies disabled; the DCForum software requires cookies to work properly.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend

Reading Topic #792

cl180Member since Jun-3-03 · 87 postsSep 11, 2003 9:15 AM

Most of us, if not all use the delevoper mode do we not?
One thing that ive found very annoying, is having to change the Developer ID to my developer ID number, which ages ago, i found this document on it, and it suggested just "12345678"!Most routes already have this as their number (i think) but why don't route developers put this one in anyway, and all BVE simmers just use the same number?
Makes things easier, but what do you think?

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

RE: Developer Mode Standardation?, ferrovipathe, Sep-11-03, 05:49 AM, (1) RE: Developer Mode Standardation?, Tim Frost, Sep-11-03, 06:13 AM, (2) RE: Developer Mode Standardation?, Stooopid_person, Sep-11-03, 06:23 AM, (3) RE: Developer Mode Standardation?, tube_dude, Sep-11-03, 10:49 AM, (4) RE: Developer Mode Standardation?, Thomas Corcoran, Sep-11-03, 11:24 AM, (5) RE: Developer Mode Standardation?, Tim Frost, Sep-11-03, 12:01 PM, (6) RE: Developer Mode Standardation?, ferrovipathe, Sep-11-03, 01:03 PM, (7) RE: Developer Mode Standardation?, cl180, Sep-11-03, 04:32 PM, (8) RE: Developer Mode Standardation?, mailer_diablo, Sep-11-03, 04:59 PM, (9)

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

ferrovipatheMember since Apr-7-03 · 54 postsSep 11, 2003 9:49 AM

RE: Developer Mode Standardation?

Developer ID had been created for debugging routes. It is not the standart mode of BVE. And developer ID is ususaly deleted in final routes' files.
If you want to see route very quickly, the best way is track viewer. So I don't understand that need of common ID, even if '12345678' is the most simple way to type something quickly without error.All the best.

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Tim FrostMember since Apr-9-03 · 348 postsSep 11, 2003 10:13 AM

RE: Developer Mode Standardation?

Yes, I can't say I particularly like the idea of lots of people scampering about running routes at high speeds and closing the doors prematurely! Developer mode detracts from the realism for playing BVE in some regards. Let it be if you ask me. Tim Frost
NVTA Subway routes for BVE:
http://nvta.co.uk
Developer Mode Standardation? – image 3
The Union Atlantic Railroad: Your stuff's important!
http://union-atlantic.com

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Stooopid_personCharter Member · 2878 postsSep 11, 2003 10:23 AM

RE: Developer Mode Standardation?

>Most routes already have this as their number (i think) but
>why don't route developers put this one in anyway, and all
>BVE simmers just use the same number?
>Makes things easier, but what do you think? Deverloper mode is supposed to be for "developers", right? So what for do you want to use developer mode?

--You are reading my signature now, don't waste your time reading it!--
Eh, where did my signature go?
Where has my favourite LUL train gone? Maybe it was sent for bolt checking again...

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

tube_dudeMember since Jul-20-03 · 261 postsSep 11, 2003 2:49 PM

RE: Developer Mode Standardation?

I dont know if this is anything tio do with this, but you can select Developer mode on both BRR9.1 ad 10

Developer Mode Standardation? – image 5
The British BVE Homepage - http://www.bvedepot.co.uk

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Thomas CorcoranMember since Apr-10-03 · 43 postsSep 11, 2003 3:24 PM

RE: Developer Mode Standardation?

Well if you are operating a train in One Man mode you have to close the doors so for me that adds to the realism. That is the only reason I use it.

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Tim FrostMember since Apr-9-03 · 348 postsSep 11, 2003 4:01 PM

RE: Developer Mode Standardation?

Yes, but then you're 'hot' and few things make me more angry than a train that left before it's specified time!! Tim Frost
NVTA Subway routes for BVE:
http://nvta.co.uk
Developer Mode Standardation? – image 7
The Union Atlantic Railroad: Your stuff's important!
http://union-atlantic.com

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

ferrovipatheMember since Apr-7-03 · 54 postsSep 11, 2003 5:03 PM

RE: Developer Mode Standardation?

Yes.
Routes had been builded to be run without Developer mode.
While doing in other way than the author's choices, you are not respecting them.
If you want do use developer mode, create a route using it by yourself. It will be your choice, and everybody will respect it.

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

cl180Member since Jun-3-03 · 87 postsSep 11, 2003 8:32 PM