LAST EDITED ON Nov-06-04 AT 05:25 AM (EST)
A literal translation of the first post:
Hello to everybody. Despues to fight with the TSM and the MSTS to me, to obtain that this last one accepted the model of tranvia, that podeis to see in the captures that come next. Finally I have been able to concern it to MSTS. For the peculiar ones, I will say that after sabbatic months, taken so that one went the climb and the frustration to me, I have decided on a radical solution that has allowed me, finally, to see circulate the object of so many and so many hours of effort and that to MSTS it did not give the desire him to accept. The solution has consisted of dividing vehiculo in three different vehiculos (locomotive and two cars) that form a composition. First (the locomotive) it groups all the pieces with textures Solid Norm and similars. Segunto groups all the Trans Norm. And the third all Solid Bright and Trans Bright. Of this form MSTS it has had to good to accept the model. In order to comprise the composition and that each vehiculo (or of tranvia) occupies the place that corresponds to him, and altogether give the three the sensation of one single one, I have had to manipulate the archives eng, wag and sd, in the dimensions, I hook and bounding box. With to say, for example, that to vehiculo locomotive him I have had to assign length of "single millimeter", so that the other two occupy the relative position that corresponds to them, is already this whole. Tranvia reproduced, is a car of the type Brill 23 of tranvias of Porto (STCP), very wanted by my, strictly personal reasons. And of which I have good fotografias, with which I have been able to make textures that allow to give a good sensation of realism to the model. This vehiculo, happens to make company to tranvia on watch nº 66 of the STCP that I showed months ago. I hope to make other two tranvias Brill 23 with registration numbers different and of line, and to publish four more ahead (quizas in pack). I hope that you like the captures.... If it is that you like tranvias. A greeting to all.2nd post in same thread translates:
Before nothing, thank you very much to all. To tranvia it needs todavia some adjustments and adjustments. With respect to the questions on the route. In fact one is two routes: The five first captures, are made in my route Rail Càssic 2.0. This route is to means to do and I stopped it months ago, to the delay of the MSTS2. appearance But with the news that there is, because we will already see....... Now so far, I do not believe that continue. To work on a mountainous layout with the REDC is highly frustrating. In addition, once you have proven the publisher of TRS 2004, and return to the REDC, the frustrations and previous climbs, are multiplied by ten.... is highly irritating (the REDC). And one is dedicated to this to pass it well, does not stop to suffer with any nimiedad that to this program it less gives him by not aceptarte at the thought moment. Or said of another way: To do bién a route (real or fictitious) already is of by sufficiently complicated himself, like so that, ademas, you have to do as the publisher of routes dedicates to complicarte the life. What if I am trying now with MSTS, it is a much but simple route. It is of exclusively tranviario character, and I am raising it on a land totalment level in the zone urban, and slight and smoothly mountainous in the suburban zone. I am simplifying it to the maximum not to load it of polygons and to avoid therefore the so frustrating pulls.... We will already see that it happens. In this route in construction, it is where the sixth capture is done. Its name is (alive the originality): Tram Clàssic 1,0 I do not promise anything with respect to this route, because as the REDC begins to do of hers, the control to take wind and hope to some of the new simulators, that say that they will be compatible with MSTS. Enfin, nothing else, and I repeat: THANKS To ALL FOR The CONGRATULATIONS And The SPIRITS. A hug, _________________ JordiHis third post translates:
Thanks to everybody for the commentaries. Indeed fccarreño: They have certain similar with those of Lisbon. Leaving part which tranvias of I carry are of wide standard and those of Lisbon they are of via narrow (concretely of 900 mm of gauge). The similarity must that almost all tranvias Portuguese, with some exceptions in some séries of Lisbon, Coimbra and Porto, they are of American design, or Portuguese design inspired by American. Asi for example, car 169 that I have reproduced, belongs to a model of the company J. G. Brill de Philadelphia. Concretely to the type Brill 23 (23 seated seats) that was cars of a standard model of this company/signature, of the type "Semi-Convertible". This last one means, that they went equipped with a system of windows designed by Brill, by which these podian to retract themselves during the summer within double ceilings, located between linternon and the lateral ones of the hall passengers (of ahi the cleared form whom the interior of the ceiling in those zones presented/displayed), and this way "they convertian" open cars semi in summer. On the other hand, the cars from Lisbon to that you talk about, pertaining to série 700 of CARRIS (Carris of ferro of Lisbon) in Castilian: Iron tracks of Lisbon, correspond to a design developed by the own CARRIS that derives from the American designs of Brill. Concretely of the first cars of series 500 of CARRIS, that were also cars of the type Brill Semi-Convertible but this narrow time of via. The most apparent difference, was that cars 700, replaced the ceiling with linternon of the first 500, by a ceiling very made convex, characteristic of many tranvias Portuguese and tipico of the American tranviarios designs, of the Thirties and forty. The cars ex- Lisbon that circulate in Soller, pertenecian to series 700 of CARRIS. Pardon by peñazo of explanation, but not quite often can be spoken of tranvias. It is a very minority subject. and one is animated.... A greeting to everybody, Jordi.Fourth post in response to a question, I think:
Javier, As he commented in post previous, this tranvia has taken much work to me so that MSTS accepted it and it did not hang itself. The problem is in the structure of jerarquias of the different pieces that compose it (vehiculo has thirteen thousands and some poligonos). I reproduce the text that in this respect I put in the beginning of this thread: The solution has consisted of dividing vehiculo in three different vehiculos (locomotive and two cars) that form a composition. First (the locomotive) it groups all the pieces with textures Solid Norm and similars. Segunto groups all the Trans Norm. And the third all Solid Bright and Trans Bright. Of this form MSTS it has had to good to accept the model. In order to comprise the composition and that each vehiculo (or of tranvia) occupies the place that corresponds to him, and altogether give the three the sensation of one single one, I have had to manipulate the archives eng, wag and sd, in the dimensions, I hook and bounding box. With to say, for example, that to vehiculo locomotive him I have had to assign length of "single millimeter", so that the other two occupy the relative position that corresponds to them, is already this whole. This solution I do not like (she is not clean) and I am going to try to structure it of another way; to see if with himself. This is what it is restraining to me. Greetings, Jordi _________________ Jordi....and another:Hello Leeward, I use program TSM. Quizas is but the problematic one to obtain a structure of jerarquias, that the MSTS must to good accept. But it is a tremendously friendly program in his handling. By the way, in another order of things: I have observed, that all the Portuguese virtual modelistas, single reproducis material modern movil. The traction to steam in landscaping aesthetic Portugal and all and the railway one of their time, were truely sensational. Personally, I keep a close memory from my trips to Portugal at that time, to film the Portuguese steam trains. Specially, memory with a particular affection all "the estreita" line of via (Tua - Bragança, Regua - Chaves, Libraçao - Arc of Baulhe, the network of I carry, the network of the Vouga, etc.). It is a true pain, that all that I magnify movil material (mallet series E160 and E200, the Mikado series E130 and E140, 130T series E80 and E110, the cars of passengers German with its small furnaces of the heating in the platforms, etc...) does not deserve the attention of somebody. The lines of via narrow Portuguese, along with all their equivalent Spaniards, form without doubt, the set of more interesting line and with more "claw" of all Europe (with permission of the RhB), and by the sight they do not interest almost to anybody. She is one suffers. You think about all that material. The Portuguese steam deserves it. A greeting, _________________ Published: 14/07/2004 13:15 Leeward, forgot to me: If some of you is decided by algun material of via it narrows; please, modeladlo to circulate on via really narrows. Hagais that solution not to adapt it to via wide. The result is disastrous. Greetings, _________________ JordiPosted in the name of science (And apologies to Jordi - but such magnificent work deserves to be known.
Alert | IP
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
