DCForum Discussion Forum - woooooooooo wooooooooooooo wooo wooooooooooooooo the Bi

the biggest, meanest, largest, noisiest steam loco ( big Boy )
is getting closer then ever to get Big Boy done!
i hope some one could build a 4-8-8-8-4!!!!!!!!! imaginary!!!!
wouldnt that be swell!

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

RE: woooooooooo wooooooooooooo wooo wooooooooooooooo th..., cyclone1234, Apr-17-02, 08:06 AM, (1) RE: woooooooooo wooooooooooooo wooo wooooooooooooooo th..., bcdef, Apr-17-02, 10:52 AM, (2) I DONT WANNA WAIT THAT LONG!, cyclone1234, Apr-17-02, 11:45 AM, (3) RE: I DONT WANNA WAIT THAT LONG!, cyclone1234, Apr-17-02, 02:05 PM, (4) RE: I DONT WANNA WAIT THAT LONG!, bcdef, Apr-17-02, 08:20 PM, (5) RE: I DONT WANNA WAIT THAT LONG!, TrirailF40PHL, Apr-18-02, 05:57 PM, (6) RE: I DONT WANNA WAIT THAT LONG!, cyclone1234, Apr-18-02, 06:04 PM, (7) RE: I DONT WANNA WAIT THAT LONG!, tryagin, Apr-18-02, 10:59 PM, (8) RE: I DONT WANNA WAIT THAT LONG!, bcdef, Apr-19-02, 06:33 PM, (9)

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

a 4-8-8-8-4? then instead of a 5 mile train, we'd have a 10 mile train, and every time that thing ran outa coal, we'd have to haul 150 cars of coal over to just fill it up! LoL!!

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

oh how about a 6-8-8-8-8-6!!!
about a 20 mile train it could carry!!!
it would be neat!

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

whell, thata be too long to go over any railroad crossings cause a 20 mile train going at 40 mph, it would take 30 minuites to get throughthe crossing! GEEZ! cyclone1234

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

oh yeah, also, the UP on that 6-8-8-8-8-6 would stand for Unorganised Problem Locomotive
cyclone1234

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

>oh yeah, also, the UP on
>that 6-8-8-8-8-6 would stand for
>Unorganised Problem Locomotive
>
>
>cyclone1234 well ya and probly the reson that the railroads didnt have a duble articulated engine is probly cause of when the boiler is stickin out a mile and engine might tip over!!!!! or should i say hahahaha! the railroads can be smart when they wanta be!!!

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

How about a 6-6-10-10-10-6 + 6-10-10-10-6-6?Kurt

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

>How about a 6-6-10-10-10-6 + 6-10-10-10-6-6?
>
>
>
>
>Kurt
lets get the 4-8-8-4 and 4-8-4+4-8-4 done before we get any biggercyclone1234

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Let's get back to reality, here. How about a 2-8-8-8-2?
ERIE No 5014Expensive failure later rebuilt into a 2-8-8-0.
Tim

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

WOW Big Ma
thats the name of the engine first articulated steam in america in early 1900's!
wow! can i buy that steam for 12 golden $? LOL!!

Alert | IP