Train-Sim.Com
General

Why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero"

Notice to all visitors and members of the Train-Sim.Com message forums:
If you plan on using a signature banner in your posts, we would like to remind you that there is a maximum size for banners. That maximum is 450 pixels wide by 120 pixels high, and not to exceed 25k. Your compliance is appreciated. FORUM RULES Problems? There are two common reasons for problems with logging in and posting messages. The first is that you are running a firewall that prevents your messages from being sent to the server. The other is that you have cookies disabled; the DCForum software requires cookies to work properly.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend

Reading Topic #8538

Member since Dec-5-03 · 52 posts

For those who have heard a dispatcher give a clearance or authority over the radio when ever the information is repeated they always say "naught" instead of "zero". Example "engine 5052", "fifty, fifty two - five, naught, five, two..." Why don't they like the word "zero"? Why "naught"?

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

RE: why railroads say, Erick_Cantu, Jun-02-04, 00:31 AM, (1) RE: why railroads say, chucksc, Jun-02-04, 00:47 AM, (2) RE: why railroads say, ASR_Q301, Jun-02-04, 00:52 AM, (3) RE: why railroads say, cdntrains, Jun-02-04, 01:01 AM, (4) RE: why railroads say, msavianney, Jun-02-04, 01:26 AM, (5) RE: why railroads say, Claude350, Jun-02-04, 02:19 AM, (6) RE: why railroads say, jdtrainman, Jun-17-04, 00:23 AM, (26) RE: why railroads say, Grimace780, Jun-15-04, 08:25 PM, (24) RE: why railroads say, Vulcan Foundry, Jun-02-04, 02:20 AM, (7) RE: why railroads say, Poltergeist, Jun-02-04, 09:14 AM, (8) RE: why railroads say, XRails, Jun-02-04, 12:19 PM, (10) RE: why railroads say, shoskins, Jun-04-04, 04:21 PM, (18) RE: why railroads say, kevarc, Jun-02-04, 10:20 AM, (9) RE: why railroads say, mquist, Jun-02-04, 01:43 PM, (11) RE: why railroads say, FURX, Jun-02-04, 04:04 PM, (12) RE: why railroads say, Vern, Jun-02-04, 04:51 PM, (13) RE: why railroads say, allcanadian_trains, Jun-02-04, 04:58 PM, (14) RE: why railroads say, eshr85, Jun-02-04, 06:05 PM, (15) RE: why railroads say, erniep, Jun-03-04, 08:15 AM, (16) RE: why railroads say, Darkviper01, Jun-14-04, 09:47 AM, (20) RE: why railroads say, kro52, Jun-15-04, 07:17 AM, (22) RE: why railroads say, shoskins, Jun-04-04, 04:19 PM, (17) RE: why railroads say, CBF, Jun-13-04, 11:26 PM, (19) RE: why railroads say, ATF1224, Jun-14-04, 12:33 PM, (21) RE: why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero", heavyd, Jun-15-04, 03:22 PM, (23) RE: why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero", robertlearmont, Jun-16-04, 07:35 PM, (25)

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Member since Jan-25-04 · 152 posts

RE: why railroads say

why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 1

...Probably the same reason why pilots say 'niner...' because it sounds lame and balances out all the cool lingo. why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 2why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 3"The Genesis and the F59PHI are the lamest locomotives Amtrak has ever operated. Accept it and move on. Hug an F40."

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 4765 posts

RE: why railroads say

Actually it's for clarity....
It's hard to confuse Naught and Niner for anything else isn't it?Chuck Schneider
Chief Cook, Bottle Washer and (Virtual) CEOwhy railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 4

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 1767 posts

RE: why railroads say

why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 5

Yeah, My Instuctor used to go "burko" at me for just saying "nine" whilst I was doing some flying lessons. It had to be niner. For the reason that Chuck gave.>Mike Forster<
Perth, Western Australiapacificnational_nr103@hotmail.comwhy railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 6

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 485 posts

RE: why railroads say

why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 8

My understanding was that from the 1930s, NACA (the aeronautics organisation that spawned NASA later) decided that 'niner' was better because it 'cut' through the fuzz of the early radios better than 'nine'. Same with 'A-OK'.Cheers,
Matt

-----------
Team-ALCO
-----------

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Apr-8-03 · 1273 posts

RE: why railroads say

You haven't heard it on SSB on a fading HF signal.... WORSE on an AM signal.... The real reason is that nine and five are more often confused....JBD
aka: KU0G (ham radio since 1976)
(No wise-cracks about QCWA-readiness, please!)

Jim Duncan
Midwest Rail Group

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Apr-18-03 · 109 posts

RE: why railroads say

Click to send message via ICQ

>ya, i don't know where the naught comes in, but the reason
>for 'niner' is because 'nine' can sound a lot like 'ten'
>over a radio In aviation and the military, "ten" is never said over the radio. For clarity over a radio, numbers are preceded by "numeral..." and read out one by one. Example: "Approaching milepost numeral one six seven".At least that is the way a friend of mine who has some aviation and military experience recently explained it.Cheers,
Gary Cameron
Grande Prairie "The last civilized stop before Alaska," AB
Canada

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Oct-8-02 · 647 posts

RE: why railroads say

why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 10

>Actually it's for clarity....
>It's hard to confuse Naught and Niner for anything else
>isn't it?
>
>Chuck Schneider
>Chief Cook, Bottle Washer and (Virtual) CEO
>why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 11
Correct. Zero could be mistaken for Zulu when using Phonetic pronunciation, hence naught is used to indicate the number zero.

Bringing Wisdom to an unwise world and also tea.
Mainly I bring tea.

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Aug-8-02 · 1293 posts

RE: why railroads say

why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 12

I was told that Nine could be confused with Neight (A German word), so they use Niner to make it sound less like Neight.

Sean Summer AKA Poltergeist
"The voices, the voices, I hear them, they're with me, so I follow I follow..." ~Eminem's "Guilty Conscious"

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Feb-22-04 · 99 posts

RE: why railroads say

>I was told that Nine could be confused with Neight (A German word), so they use Niner to make it sound less like Neight. Yeah, that's what I heard too. I was also told that neight means "no", so it's pretty important not to mess that up!

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 1445 posts

RE: why railroads say

>>I was told that Nine could be confused with Neight (A German word), so they use Niner to make it sound less like Neight.
>
>Yeah, that's what I heard too. I was also told that neight
>means "no", so it's pretty important not to mess that up! German for "no" is "nein".

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Aug-5-03 · 277 posts

RE: why railroads say

Niner is used because it is a RULE which is not to be violated. It comes from military radio procedure. It is not alone 5 is pronounced "fife" like the small flute. For some reason early in the history of military radio telephony some signal officer decided that they were easier to understand and it stuck. I expect that the earliest air trafic contol was probably a US Army funcion so they adopted the military proceudure. In the case of "naught" on the railroad procedure I suspect it is in the operation rules as well. Be Seeing you.
Michael

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Apr-18-03 · 675 posts

RE: why railroads say

why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 14

The phonetic alphabet is used for clarity, here is the alphabet from the Chessie System 1980 operating rules handbook.A---------Alfa
B---------Bravo
C---------Charlie
D---------Delta
E---------Echo
F---------Foxtrot
G---------Golf
H---------Hotel
I---------India
J---------Juliet
K---------Kilo
L---------Lima
M---------Mike
N---------November
O---------Oscar
P---------Papa
Q---------Quebec
R---------Romeo
S---------Sierra
T---------Tango
U---------Uniform
V---------Victor
W---------Whiskey
X---------X ray
Y---------Yankee
Z---------Zulu0---------Zero
1---------Wun
2---------Too
3---------Thuh-ree
4---------Fo-wer
5---------Fi-Yiv
6---------Six
7---------Seven
8---------Ate
9---------NinerGuess it depends on the road....-Jeffrey

why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 15
Courteous Future Engineer
NKP 2-8-4 #765. www.765.org
Chessie System Historical Society. http://moosevalley.org/cshs/
My Website; www.xanga.com/csxd765

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Mar-16-04 · 29 posts

RE: why railroads say

LAST EDITED ON Jun-02-04 AT 04:58 PM (EDT)

Only a few differences between them (The Chessie names ) and the RCMP Fenetic alphabet. Interesting.
CheersMorgan

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Apr-6-03 · 239 posts

RE: why railroads say

why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 16

Pretty well all Canadian railways use nought. cheers,
Ernie

Don't take life too seriously, just remember what not to do next time around.

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 1445 posts

RE: why railroads say

>...Probably the same reason why pilots say 'niner...'
>because it sounds lame and balances out all the cool lingo. Actually, it's NOT to "balance otu the cool lingo" but rather to make a definite difference between FIVE and NINE which can sound similar on a noisy radio channel.

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Aug-17-02 · 224 posts

RE: why railroads say

The way it was explained in the early fifties, was to make the phonetics of letters and numbers NATO compatable, so that there would be less confusion between co-operating nationalities. This brought out the Alpha, Bravo phonetic letters and the use of fife and niner.Cheers, All; Chuck F. (Ex RCAF)

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Dec-5-03 · 52 posts

RE: why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero"

Actually, I heard just today the RTC give a clearance and repeat using the word "ZERO". I heard it just fine.

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Apr-8-03 · 733 posts

RE: why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero"

why railroads say "naught" instead of "zero" – image 20

I'll guess it's something like we do in the Civil Air Patrol.A- Alfa
B- Bravo
C- Charlie
D- Delta
E- Echo
F- Foxtrot
G- Golf
H- Hotel
I- India
J- Juliett
K- Kilo
L- Lima
M- Mike
N- November
O- Osca
P- Papa
Q- Quebec
R- Romeo
S- Sierra
T- Tango
U- Uniform
V- Victor
W- Whiskey
X- X-ray
Y- Yankee
Z-Zulu1- One
2- Two
3- Tree
4- Four
5- Fife
6- Six
7- Seven
8- Eight
9- Niner
0- Zero
Google, Google, Google!
Simplest answers are always the best!

Howdy!
Bob
E-mail: robertlearmont@realcountryfan.com

Alert | IP


[ Home | MSTS Forum | MSTS FAQ | How To... | File Library ] Copyright © 2004 by Nels Anderson. All Rights Reserved.

Restored from the Train-Sim.Com archive, captured January 5, 2005. About this archive.