Train-Sim.Com
General

Angels on Track

Notice to all visitors and members of the Train-Sim.Com message forums:
If you plan on using a signature banner in your posts, we would like to remind you that there is a maximum size for banners. That maximum is 450 pixels wide by 120 pixels high, and not to exceed 25k. Your compliance is appreciated. FORUM RULES Problems? There are two common reasons for problems with logging in and posting messages. The first is that you are running a firewall that prevents your messages from being sent to the server. The other is that you have cookies disabled; the DCForum software requires cookies to work properly.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend

Reading Topic #8049

Member since May-11-03 · 222 posts

Click to send message via ICQ

Angels on Track – image 1

Forwarded message I got this morning.
(Orginal sender's name hidden)> > dear angels on track,
> > >
> > > I agree with your effort's to get railroad crossing's to be
> > better
> > > lighted with crossing light's, gates, etc. But I must say that
> > your
> > > slogan of " Bad crossing's kill good driver's" is not even true.
> > First
> > > off, the railroad has been here for over 150 years. Back in the
> > old day's
> > > train's crossed crossing's that only had a crossing sign at over
> > 90 MPH.
> > > People did not get killed. They looked, listened, and then crossed
> > the
> > > track. A driver that does not take the time to look before they
> > cross is
> > > stupid. The railroad has al way's had the right of way, and will
> > al
> > > way's. There is nothing that can be done about that. If you want
> > to make
> > > a difference, put the responsibility where it belong's. On the
> > stupid
> > > driver that think's that he or she does not have to slow down,
> > look, or
> > > listen. The Federal law requires engineers to blow there horn. Now
> > The
> > > engineer also suffers with a death at a crossing. many people have
> > had to
> > > get serious care because at night they dream of the face of the
> > child
> > > staring at them just before impact and there is nothing that they
> > can do.
> > > Please. They are just doing there job. They are just as innocent
> > as the
> > > person that crossed in front of the train and got hit. This nation
> > has
> > > gone way to far in not putting the responsibility on the person
> > who is
> > > actually responsible. So again I agree with you trying to get
> > more
> > > protection, but your slogan is false. If they were good drivers
> > they
> > > would not have pulled out in front of that train.
> > >
> > > B.P.
>
> > Mr. Porter. Thank you for contacting our Foundation, and while
> > you state you take exception to our slogan "Bad Crossings Kill
> > Good Drivers", I must tell you that the opinions of others will
> > never
> > alter the mission or focus of our Foundation.
> >
> > This slogan was not just pulled out of a hat. It is based on fact.
> > Only approximately 20% of our nation's railroad crossings are
> > protected with gates. Most, if not all, railroad crossings do not
> > meet FHWA/AASHTO sight line requirements for safe passage
> > across tracks. Even crossings with protection (gates and lights)
> > malfunction. Crossings with passive markings (crossbucks, stop
> > signs, Buckeye crossbucks) do not warn of an approaching train.
> > All of these are BAD CROSSINGS and kill hundreds of people
> > each year. To believe that all railroad crossing accidents are
> > caused by irresponsible motorists, is a unfounded stereotype that
> > has been accepted by unknowing individuals.
> >
> > And contrary to your statement ("back in the old days train's
> > crossed
> > crossings that only had a crossing sign at over 90 mph.
> > People did not get killed").... thousands were killed each year
> > and thousands were injured during the late 1800's and early/mid
> > 1900's. Crossing accidents have only decreased due to railroad
> > mergers,
> > crossing consolidations and closures, and installation of
> > protection
> > devices (gates). The safest year in railroad history (1999), 1369
> > people were injured and 402 people lost their lives. I find that
> > solemn
> > statistic to brag about, especially to those, like myself, who have
> > lost
> > a loved one to a dangerous crossing.
> >
> > To say all you have to do is look, listen and cross, is a dangerous
> > assumption and a deadly one at best. If you can't see down the
> > tracks
> > because sight obstructions such as trees, buildings, brush, parked
> > railroad
> > equipment, how can a motorist tell if a train is coming? If the FRA
> > whistle
> > ban is adopted
> > this coming December trains will not sound their horns at whistle
> > posts
> > posted 1/4 mile down the track, what will you listen for? Do you
> > honestly think that the railroad companies and their employees
> > always
> > follow required safety procedures such as train speeds, flagging
> > crossings
> > that have malfunctioned, etc., and the railroad companies have no
> > responsibility
> > for public safety?
> >
> > The fact is there is alot that can be done about dangerous railroad
> > crossings.
> > First, there is no excuse why all railroad crossings are not
> > protected with
> > properly functioning gates. Second, there is nothing precluding
> > the
> > railroads
> > from funding installation of protection (gates), they just choose
> > not to.
> > Third,
> > instead of always blaming the motorists for virtually all railroad
> > crossing
> > accidents,
> > current educational programs and organizations (funded by railroads)
> > should
> > present an unbiased message, based on facts, to address the true
> > causes
> > for railroad crossing accidents. These messages are used to focus
> > on the
> > victim and not the railroads conscious disregard for public safety.
> > Fourth,
> > all speed tapes and event recorders should be turned over to an
> > independent
> > agency after an accident, not the railroads involved. Also taking
> > into
> > account
> > most highway patrol, sheriff departments, emergency personnel, and
> > first
> > aid responders have been trained by our nation's railroads in
> > "railroad grade
> >
> > crossing accident investigation" to determine the cause. Now who do
> > you
> > think they will find at fault?
> >
> > You might be interested in knowing that we have the continued
> > support and
> > well wishes from current and past railroad employees. We also have
> > the support from experts within the railroad industry. To tell me
> > that you
> > support our Foundation's goals to install gates at all crossings,
> > but then
> > take exception with our slogan, can only be taken as lack of
> > knowledge
> > on your part as to what needs to change. Nowhere in our slogan do
> > we
> > mention railroad employees, we address the crossings. And, bad
> > crossings
> > also kill railroad employees. You might want to visit the
> > http://www.csx-sucks.com
> > website. Go to safety. Read the posts from those employees. They
> > support
> > what we are saying, and confirm the lack of concern that exists
> > today for
> > dangerous crossings. And, we also have the RRESQ link posted on
> > our
> > website (Crossing To Safety section). If we were not interested in
> > the
> > safety of all, public and railroad employees, why would we have a
> > link on
> > our website?
> >
> > I will not argue with you. I will repeat that you are sadly
> > mistaken
> > and too readily willing to accept what has been accepted for far too
> > long
> > as to what causes these accidents. Only those people with a
> > sincere
> > wish to stop these needless tragedies, will open up their minds and
> > look at the other side of the story............that which has not
> > been
> > told in the past. May God send peace and understanding to your
> > heart to understand our Foundation.
> >
> > Vicky L. Moore, Trustee
> > The Angels on Track Foundation
> > Crossing To Safety
> > "BAD CROSSINGS KILL GOOD DRIVERS" (R)
> >
> >
> >
> > Well Vicky L. Moore,
>
> Thank you for at least writing back. I have to say that I am
> ignorant of some thing's and you have given me some interesting info. I
> thank you for that information, but I believe that you also are ignorant
> of some thing's, but you said "I will not argue with you. I will repeat
> that you are sadly mistaken". That lead's me to believe that you are not
> as you said ready to "open up their minds and look at the other side of
> the story......" So I will not waist your time or mine. Good luck in your
> work and I wish you well.
> Have a super day
>
> B.P.Greg Zoll

DT&I MSTS Addons Coming Mid-2004
Email: greg@dti407.tk
http://www.dti407.tk
http://dti407.blogspot.com

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

RE: Angels on Track, Gecko, Mar-16-04, 06:52 PM, (1) RE: Angels on Track, ssw_96, Mar-16-04, 07:40 PM, (2) RE: Angels on Track, Ohara, Mar-16-04, 07:51 PM, (3) RE: Angels on Track, Grimace780, Mar-17-04, 02:29 PM, (7) RE: Angels on Track, cn_bayview, Mar-16-04, 08:01 PM, (4) RE: Angels on Track, Mark_Blum, Mar-16-04, 09:11 PM, (5) RE: Angels on Track, TrainTrak5000, Mar-16-04, 09:21 PM, (6) RE: Angels on Track, CGW409, Mar-17-04, 08:21 PM, (9) RE: Angels on Track, ssw, Mar-17-04, 07:52 PM, (8) RE: Angels on Track, robertlearmont, Mar-17-04, 08:49 PM, (10) RE: Angels on Track, Hack, Mar-17-04, 08:53 PM, (11) RE: Angels on Track, yellowdog, Mar-18-04, 12:21 PM, (12) RE: Angels on Track, FURX, Mar-18-04, 02:57 PM, (13) RE: Angels on Track, CGW409, Mar-18-04, 06:48 PM, (14)

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Charter Member · 1971 posts

RE: Angels on Track

Angels on Track – image 2

Man that site is a joke. I e mailed them a couple years ago and I got so much hate mail from the members. I wrote them a nasty e mail and told them off, and i told them like it is. They have a biased opinion against railroad crossings. Im going to e mail them again and let em have it.

Angels on Track – image 3 Angels on Track – image 4
The best railroad there ever was

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Apr-18-03 · 84 posts

RE: Angels on Track

Click to send message via ICQ

Mark (and anyone else who might know):I heard somewhere that over 50% of train / motor vehicle collisions in Canada are attributed to driver error. Meaning that lights and / or gates where appropriate are working and activated, there is clear visibilty, good weather, the train was sounding its horn, and so on. I do not have US data but I assume it is probably similar. Can anyone verify this for me?In the past five years a cousin and a good friend of mine were killed in two separate unrelated incidents at railroad crossings. The one fellow was a farmer who regularly crossed the CN line at an uncontrolled (only cross-bucks) rural crossing near his farm. For whatever reason, possibly due to the loudness of the farm tractor he was on, he did not hear the horn of the train and did not look before crossing the tracks. Reports say that the engineer could see him from a very long way back and knew exactly what was going to happen but there was no way to stop the mile long freight train in time. Quite possibly he had gotten too familiar with the crossing and allowed himself to be distracted.The other fellow was an older gentleman who was nearly deaf. He was killed at a crossing that had flashing lights. Police suggested that the sun may caused enoug of a glare that prevented him from seeing that the crossing lights were flashing. Witnesses say the train was sounding its horn in the usual manner. Again, human error.I have a policy of stopping at any crossing that is not protected by lights or gates. As I approach, I turn off the radio. I would rather be perceived as a nusiance to traffic behind me and lose 30 seconds of time than risk killing myself or a loved one.Take care,
Gary Cameron
Grande Prairie "The last civilized stop before Alaska," AB
Canada

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 432 posts

RE: Angels on Track

Greg:Just my two cents. I was a public safety official for most of my former career. I sat on many a review board in difficult situations, such as when cop had a wreck trying to do his or her job. I learned a lot from this post, and the foundation does have good insight.On the other hand, I must agree with Mr. Porter's basic common sense instincts. If the train can't be seen, the driver should be extra careful. If you have a wreck because you're too fast for conditions, does that mean the D.O.T. needs to post signs telling you what all those conditions might be? That's ridiculous. Good drivers ARE careful drivers - most of the time.That's not to say the engineering (no pun intended - let me clarify that by saying the DESIGN engineering) at grade crossings shouldn't be the best we can make it for safety. Like someone else said - lets do all we can.The way I read the stuff you posted, Mr. Porter is definately the one with the open mind here. Glad he replied to them the second time. They should change the slogan to Bad Crossings Kill people who are good drivers most of the time.Good post. Thanks!Mark
A Southern Railway Fan

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 823 posts

RE: Angels on Track

Angels on Track – image 6

I wonder why they give no mention of Operation Lifesaver anywhere on their website...-- Mike Karlik --
Angels on Track – image 7
-- Virginia Rails --

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 1585 posts

RE: Angels on Track

Mike
I think the answer was given in her response..... > > instead of always blaming the motorists for virtually all railroad crossing accidents, current educational programs and organizations (funded by railroads should present an unbiased message, based on facts, to address the true causes for railroad crossing accidents. These messages are used to focus on the victim and not the railroads conscious disregard for public safety.
> > Fourth,
all speed tapes and event recorders should be turned over to an
independent agency after an accident, not the railroads involved. Also taking into account most highway patrol, sheriff departments, emergency personnel, and first aid responders have been trained by our nation's railroads in "railroad grade crossing accident investigation" to determine the cause. Now who do you think they will find at fault?
> >As one can "obviously" see Operation Lifesaver is a tool of these evil capitalist transportation companies,hell bent on killing as many of us as is possible by not setting up the absolute state of the art crossing protection at every gravel road crossing and or cow path that happens to cross a railroad track, I mean come on, if railroads really cared about saving lives they'd build all their rolling stock completely of Nerf material,it's all a conspiracy just look at the rantings of disgruntled employees as all the proof needed.Needless to say unlike Angels On Track my little rant was tounge planted very firmly in cheek what we have here is someone who wants to be the grade crossing variant of Candy Lightner (sp? founder of MADD) all because someone she loved may or may not(benefit of the doubt here)did something stupid and got themselves killed by a train(sorry for coming off as a cold SOB)and because there is no way that her loved one could ever do something stupid it must be the railroad killed them through not spending enough money.Gary S


42 year old future curmudgen(Hey you kids get offa my lawn!!)

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 2101 posts

RE: Angels on Track

Angels on Track – image 8

I wonder when this group will:a: realize the existence of Operation Lifesaver
b. RESEARCH what they're going on about. I had a good laugh at the FRA horn ban.. that's only if the crossing in question has specific safety devices.. the way they talk the FRA just banned the use of horns at every crossing regardless.
I'd much rather support Operation Lifesaver than this bunch of crusaders.

Bradley Linda
Waco, Texas

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Member since Apr-8-03 · 709 posts

RE: Angels on Track

Angels on Track – image 9

Good drivers look. Bad drivers get killed because thay don't look. The only accident I heard of was at a crossing with functioning gates. Good drivers look at all crossings, terrible drivers look at no crossings, including bad ones.Google, Google, Google
Always remember to use it!

Howdy!

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 3353 posts

RE: Angels on Track

I'll begin with this: http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=53517Although I'm not familiar with the above local, it would appear from the picture that the driver had an unobstructed view of the tracks, yet decided to ignore the gates and take his chances...He (and his passenger) was very lucky.Now, onto the specific of the original post... Interesting that Ms. Moore doesn't take into account the traffic patterns for the crossings in question; whether they're on public or private crossings; in rural areas; local laws; etc. If only 20% of the rail/highway crossings are protected (BTW, are all the crossings she mentions public, or does this also include private?), then why do the majority of accidents happen at "properly" protected public crossings? Ms. Moore may believe whatever she chooses. I however, choose to believe in hard evidence and documented facts, not some pigeon-holed number without basis or reference.However, and without taking either, I've compiled a 3-year summary I pulled from DOT after a simple search on Yahoo. The statistics below are for fatal and non-fatal accidents/incidents at public crossings, plus the total incidents resulting in a fatality (vehicle vs. train). It's interesting to note that in two of the reports, the accident rate was higher for public crossings protected by active warning devices (ie: bells, gates, etc.) than at crossings with only basic or no protection at all, and only slightly lower in the 1996 report. Nevertheless, the accident/incident rate was higher over the three year period combined.Note: No information about line-of-sight or malfunctioning equipment was given, and since this would be contained in specific accident reports and other statistics regarding percentages of failed crossings, etc. Specific data on this information would most likely be held at the NTSB.- Links to each of the three bulletins is provided for reference.
- Statistics are for all 50 US states.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994 ACCIDENTS/INCIDENTS AT HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSINGS, BY WARNING DEVICE
http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/bull94.htmlGates, Flashing Lights, Hwy Signal/Wigwag/Bells, Special*: 2,176
Crossbucks, Stop Signs, Other Signs, No Signs: 2,120Total Vehicle Accidents Resulting in Fatality for 1994 at Public Crossings: 572
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 ACCIDENTS/INCIDENTS AT HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSINGS, BY WARNING DEVICE
http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/bull95.htmlGates, Flashing Lights, Hwy Signal/Wigwag/Bells, Special*: 2001
Crossbucks, Stop Signs, Other Signs: 1971Total Vehicle Accidents Resulting in Fatality for 1995 at Public Crossings: 524
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 ACCIDENTS/INCIDENTS AT HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSINGS, BY WARNING DEVICE
http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/bull96.htmlGates, Flashing Lights, Hwy Signal/Wigwag/Bells, Special*: 1795
Crossbucks, Stop Signs, Other Signs: 1817Total Vehicle Accidents Resulting in Fatality for 1996 at Public Crossings: 449
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMBINED TOTALS - 1994 THROUGH 1996Gates, Flashing Lights, Hwy Signal/Wigwag/Bells, Special*: 5972
Crossbucks, Stop Signs, Other Signs: 5908Total Vehicle Fatalities for 1994, 1995, 1996 at Public Crossings: 1,545
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: "Special" are crossings protected by watchmen or members of train crew.FRA: http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety/
National Transportation Library: http://ntl.bts.gov/Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains
http://www.3dtrains.comAngels on Track – image 10Pro Series SuperPacks

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 1343 posts

RE: Angels on Track

Good post, Marc--based on fact, not emotional response. I'd also be interested to know the correlation between train/car collisions and driver familiarity with the crossing. In other words, is it more likely the the driver in the collision is familiar with the particular crossing, or is it more likely that the driver is unfamiliar with the crossing? I would bet many collisions happen just like what someone decsribed in the tragedy above--familiarity with the crossing led to not be as cautious. But, I'd have to see factual data, not (as Marc said) pigeon-holed numbers.

Clayton

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 1585 posts

RE: Angels on Track

Marc
Good post
Just for the heck of it I went and check AOT's website and no where on the front page or about page does she go into the details of how her son died other than he was hit by a Conrail freight doing 60 in 1995.
In order to discover more details I had to dig through some of the media articles they made avalible on site(and even there I had to dig through about 3-4 until I came across an article with details) Apparently six teens in a car and a crossing protected only by crossbucks and no mention of who was at the wheel.
I can see why those salient facts are underplayed while the fact that seven people have died at that crossing since 1975(horrors,seven people over the course of twenty years ignored the fact that a train might be there at the same time as they)and focus more on the railroad's "negligence".
Hey I can remember back to my teens and when ever that many of us were in a car,the radio blasting, cutting up,etc the road sometimes was a secondary concern although I'll say approaching a rail crossing had a bit more interest hoping to get stopped by a train but I'd have to wonder if the results would have really been any different had it only been flashers at that crossing? no one can can really say as apprently none of the three that survived was driving.Gary S


42 year old future curmudgen(Hey you kids get offa my lawn!!)

Alert | IP


[ Home | MSTS Forum | MSTS FAQ | File Library ] Copyright © 2004 by Nels Anderson. All Rights Reserved.

Restored from the Train-Sim.Com archive, captured May 6, 2004. About this archive.