Train-Sim.Com
General

Higher Polys Default vs Add On's

Notice to all visitors and members of the Train-Sim.Com message forums:
If you plan on using a signature banner in your posts, we would like to remind you that there is a maximum size for banners. That maximum is 450 pixels wide by 120 pixels high, and not to exceed 25k. Your compliance is appreciated. FORUM RULES Problems? There are two common reasons for problems with logging in and posting messages. The first is that you are running a firewall that prevents your messages from being sent to the server. The other is that you have cookies disabled; the DCForum software requires cookies to work properly.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend

Reading Topic #4143

Charter Member · 483 posts

A noticble comparison I guess. I can run two C44-9W's and 100 chemical hoppers(all default) and get good frame rates. On the other hand I have several of teemu's hoppers including the 40 in 1 pack. Also I hae several non default C44-9W's (NALW's in particular)
Of the two, which has the higher poly count? Also what are other cars with a higher poly count. (I know svante's well cars are a killer)

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Charter Member · 1154 posts

RE: Higher Polys Default vs Add On's

ive ntoiced that too. When i have long trains of mostly add-on (other than TA's) rolling stock, the game lags a bit.Higher Polys Default vs Add On's – image 26
premium add-ons

Alert | IP


[ Home | MSTS Forum | MSTS FAQ | File Library ] Copyright © 2002 by Nels Anderson. All Rights Reserved.

Restored from the Train-Sim.Com archive, captured March 31, 2003. About this archive.