Since the Route Specification Forum was put online, we have had several entries. I am now noticing that some of those entries may now be invalid. Several routes have been updated with new versions, thus obviating the old entries. This produces a very real two-fold problem: (1) the entry does not contain the latest information and (2) the route that *is* listed may no longer be distributed.It has never been the plan of the moderators of the RSF to make update changes to route entries, as that can lead to claims of misrepresenting the route.Therefore, route developers, if you have submitted an entry into the RSF and you have updated your route, your entry needs to be updated.The easiest way to do that is to start from scratch, and create a new entry. If the old route is no longer available, please instruct the moderators to delete your old entry in a *separate* post. That post, of course, will NOT be accepted into the forum, but will be just for the purposes of instructions to the Moderator. Again, please do NOT put the instructions in the route information post, but put it in a separate post.Also remember, the RSF is for routes which are currently in distribution--it is not for "advertisements" about upcoming routes.Thanks for your support in this endeavor.Lawrence
Moderator
[ Home | MSTS Forum | MSTS FAQ | File Library ] Copyright © 2002 by Nels Anderson. All Rights Reserved.

