Train-Sim.Com
General

Archived thread - Read only Previous Topic | Next Topic

Notice to all visitors and members of the Train-Sim.Com message forums:
If you plan on using a signature banner in your posts, we would like to remind you that there is a maximum size for banners. That maximum is 450 pixels wide by 120 pixels high, and not to exceed 25k. Your compliance is appreciated. FORUM RULES Problems? There are two common reasons for problems with logging in and posting messages. The first is that you are running a firewall that prevents your messages from being sent to the server. The other is that you have cookies disabled; the DCForum software requires cookies to work properly.

Archived thread - Read only
Previous Topic | Next Topic

Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend

Reading Topic #1445

MJL
Charter Member

Jun-07-02, 06:23 PM (EDT)

"Water Scoop, Mechanics of Rail Equipment Question"

LAST EDITED ON Jun-07-02 AT 06:24 PM (EDT)OK, I've seen this same stupid question asked about a zillion times, and have always seen the same stupid answer.Q: How does a water scoop work for steam engines?
A: There is a scoop that is on the (tender/engine-can't remember which, but will assume on the tender). When the engine nears a section of track with water pans in it, the engine is slowed to an appropriate speed (40ish MPH), and then the fireman lowers the scoop, taking up water, and eliminating the need to stop for water. Very good for high speed passanger and express trains. ----this explananation is usually accompianed by a b&w pic of a track pan, and a b&w pic of a speeding engine w/ spray coming from the underside of it.WOW!! - that answer is really lame, from it I get the following mental image.
Archived thread - Read only Previous Topic | Next Topic – image 1
in it is a piece of metal slung under the tender, hinged at one end, and the other is a chain, or something used to raise/lower the metal scoop....but my big question is THEN WHAT?!?!?!?!?!?!!!!All of the descriptions I've seen stop at this point. So where does the water go??, from the above image it would be directed up, and out over the rear truck, and into the laps of the people on the first passanger car...not good...what sorts of piping/ducting was there to modify a tender, did the water enter the underside of the tender??, (assume not), or was it ducted out and around the back, and up over the top??
anyone have pics of the setup on a tender??just one of those things thats been bugging meMattArchived thread - Read only Previous Topic | Next Topic – image 2

Printer-friendly page | Top

Charter Member · 369 posts

Speaking from a british point... the water tank in a tender wasn't open so water going in wouldn't 'shoot' out at any time. The scoop connected to a vertical pipe topped by a large Y (the top part of the Y being curved down)shaped 'hat' so that the water would be directed sideways and downwards into the tank.Thinking about it a bit like an inverted fire sprinkler....
There usually was some overflow that tended to soak whoever wanted to find out how it worked by leaning out of the coach windows...but then it washed the soot from his face anyway...
Hope you understand what I mean.
Georges from London.

Printer-friendly page | Top

Charter Member · 538 posts

RE: Water Scoop, Mechanics of Rail Equipment Question

Ah, the water scoops. I remember my Grandfather, who was a conductor on the New York Central out of Buffalo, talking about them.The water scoops were generally curved in a 90-degree arc, so that water entering in a horizontal direction was diverted to flow upwards. The scoop connected to a duct that went vertically upwards into the water space. Ended about a foot below the top plating, with a second 90-degree bend to send the water horizontal again rather than upwards.

The scoop was raised and lowered by an air cylinder, controlled by a lever-actuated air valve on the front of the tender. Most also had an auxilary latch, worked by a chain, to retain it in the 'up' position. In use, the fireman would release the latch, stand by the valve, and wait for either a hand-sign or whistle signal by the engineer that the engine had passed a signpost placed beside the track at the beginning of the pan. The fireman opens the valve, and hangs on for dear life while the tender bucks, water sprays everywhere, and deafening noise. The engineer signals again when the engine is approaching the signpost at the end of the pan to raise the scoop. The fireman raises the scoop, sets the latch, then climbs on top of the tank to raise the hatch and look how much water was collected. And then, probably find out that you had only half-filled the tank and had to stop at the next water tank anyway. And when the train stops, the fireman gets down to look at the scoop. Had to check, often, to make sure that it had retracted all the way up, the rim was not too badly bent out of shape, and that it had not snagged on a grade crossing or ingested some ballast.There was a good reason for slowing to 40 mph. As the water rushed into the tender, the displaced air had to escape, and if the flow was too great it blew the top hatch open. Then, as your post suggested, water sprayed back towards the passengers. The New York Central fitted some of the Niagaras and Mohawks tenders (those are '4-8-4' and '4-8-2' engines) with special air vents, supposed to open if the pressure was too high and allow taking on water at speeds up to 80 mph. The fireman and enginner had to work in very close co-ordination. At 80 mph, the engine moves through the usable length of the track pan in perhaps 15 seconds, while taking on maybe 15,000 gallons of water at a thousand gallons per second. Or, for you metric users, that is taking on about two tonnes/sec at 130 kph.

Printer-friendly page | Top

MJL
Charter Member

Jun-08-02, 00:58 AM (EDT)

3. "RE: Water Scoop, Mechanics of Rail Equipment Question"
In response to message #2

black5, ge44tonner
thanks for the info, good, clear description, much better than what I read on Model RRer, or Trains, now if someone just had some pics. I'd like to see the actual mechanisims...instead of constantly having to use my 'imagination hat'
MattArchived thread - Read only Previous Topic | Next Topic – image 3

Printer-friendly page | Top

Charter Member · 362 posts

RE: Water Scoop, Mechanics of Rail Equipment Question

I once read somewhere, that those vents the NYC used didn't always open like they were supposed to. There were cases where the pressure form the water BLEW the rivets out of the tender causing the train to lose more water than it took on. Also, if I remember the figures right, the NYC water pans were like 1 mile long to accomodate the faster trains. (heated too to keep them from freezing in winter)

Printer-friendly page | Top


[ Home | MSTS Forum | MSTS FAQ | File Library ] Copyright © 2002 by Nels Anderson. All Rights Reserved.

Restored from the Train-Sim.Com archive, captured May 7, 2003. About this archive.